Home
YES PRIME MINISTER - MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING IS A HOAX
Policy

Posted 24 June 2017

Hat tip to Joanne Nova in Australia:

This post takes you to two short videos (one about 3  minutes, one 9 minutes), simply astonishing, utterly accurate and devastatingly honest about the politics of the  "global warming" issue. No one with a pulse can watch them and not laugh out loud at how ludicrous politicians, journalists and some (not all) scientists appear to be when they pontificate on global warming. These clips do a great job of explaining the state of the science and why politicians parrot the most extreme predictions and unproven claims of the alarmists.

(Comments that follow are also worth reading) 

 

Watch and listen to both here 

 
ADVOCACY MASQUERADING AS SCIENCE BAD FOR THE PLANET AND FOR SCIENCE
Policy

Posted 23 June 2017

This Breitbart paper has been described as "the most complete, accurate and persuasive answer to climate change alarmism to be published so far in 2017."  It concludes: " By withdrawing from the Paris agreement, President Trump did a wonderful thing for America and the world. He showed that advocacy masquerading as science should not be the basis for political decisions....And by rejecting the non-problem of man-made global warming, he began the long and necessary process of of waking up the likes of Professor Reif to the fact that the diversion of time, effort and trillions of dollars away from real environmental problems and to the bogus but (to MIT) profitable non-problem of supposedly catastrophic global warming is as bad for the planet as it is for true science."

Read it here 

 
FORTUNE MAGAZINE VIEW ON WHY TRUMP PULLED U.S. FROM PARIS CLIMATE ACCORD
Policy

Posted 7 June 2017

Mark Mills writes in Fortune magazine about the real reason President Trump withdrew from the Paris Climate Agreement: "The Paris climate agreement was never about climate science. Anchored in the premise that climate science is 'settled', the accord seeks to dramatically change humanity's energy supply. Here the matter really is settled: It's not going to happen."

  

Read it here 

 
NEW PAPER CALLS FOR REASSESSMENT OF HOW 'GREENHOUSE EFFECT' DETERMINES CLIMATE
Science

Posted 6 June 2017

A new paper by Ned Nikolov and Karl Zeller, at Environment Pollution and Climate Change calls for reassessment of the 'greenhouse effect' in determining climate: "Consequently, the global down-welling long-wave  flux presently assumed to drive Earth’s surface warming appears to be a product of the air temperature set by solar heating and atmospheric pressure. In other words, the so-called ‘greenhouse back radiation’ is globally a result of the atmospheric thermal effect rather than a cause for it. Our empirical model has also fundamental implications for the role of oceans, water vapour, and planetary albedo in global climate. Since produced by a rigorous attempt to describe planetary temperatures in the context of a cosmic continuum using an objective analysis of vetted observations from across the Solar System, these findings call for a paradigm shift in our understanding of the atmospheric ‘greenhouse effect’ as a fundamental property of climate." 

Download pdf file here 

 
CLIVE JAMES: CLIMATE ALARMISTS WON'T ADMIT THEY'RE WRONG
Policy

Posted 6 June 2017

In his own inimitable and entertaining way, Australian satirist Clive James writes about the difficulties of getting climate alarmists to admit their errors, but adds a warning: "When you tell people once too often that the missing extra heat is hiding in the ocean, they will switch over to watch Game of Thrones, where the dialogue is less ridiculous and all threats come true. The proponents of man-made climate catastrophe asked us for so many leaps of faith that they were bound to run out of credibility in the end. Now that they finally seem to be doing do, it could be a good time for those of us who have never been convinced by all these urgent warnings to start warning each other that we might be making a comparably senseless tactical error if we expect the elastic cause of the catastrophists, and all its exponents, to go away in a hurry."

Read full essay here 

 
ENERGY COSTS ARE AT THE ROOT OF CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY DISAGREEMENTS
Economics

Posted 6 June 2017

"By withdrawing the United States from the Paris Agreement President Trump has put the burden of proof on those private investors and nation states that believe renewable energy is economically beneficial. Far from being a disaster, this is a step towards a reasonable and spontaneously attractive climate change policy. LIke many of those vilified for their views on the subject of climate change, President Trump is more of an energy policy skeptic than an anti-rational 'denier' of atmospheric science. He senses, and with good reason, that the aggregate of energy policies proposed to mitigate climate change brings with it the threat of major wealth destruction and a reversal of several centurieds of exponential increases in human well-being." Dr John Constable writes for the Global Warming Policy Foundation, UK.

Read it here 

 
More...
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>

Results 1 - 1006 of 1280





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
This website is dedicated to the memory of Professor August H. (Augie) Auer jr, a co-founder of the Coalition.